--- description: Criteria : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Criteria, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Belgique. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Criteria - Avis, prix, tarif et abonnement - Capterra Belgique 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels pour tests de recrutement](/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) > [Criteria](/software/119740/criteria) # Criteria Canonical: https://fr.capterra.be/software/119740/criteria Page : 1/11\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/119740/criteria?page=2) > Gérez les évaluations préalables à l'emploi sur le web, avec des tests d'aptitude, de personnalité et de compétences, afin d'identifier les candidats qualifiés. > > Conclusion : 232 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.7/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Criteria ? Pour les entreprises de toutes tailles, des entreprises de 10 personnes aux organisations comptant plus de 1 000 employés. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.7/5** | 232 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.7/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Criteria Corp - **Pays**: West Hollywood, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2006 ## Contexte commercial - **Type de licence**: (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Linux (ordinateur), Windows (sur site), Linux (sur site), Chromebook (ordinateur) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, arabe, birman, chinois, coréen, croate, espagnol, français, hindi, japonais, khmer, macédonien, néerlandais, polonais, portugais, portugais brésilien, portugais européen, russe, suédois, tchèque, turc, ukrainien - **Pays disponibles**: Afghanistan, Afrique du Sud, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Barbade et 193 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - Alertes/Notifications - Base de données des employés - Bibliothèque de questions - Bibliothèque de tests pré-définis - Classement automatique - Comparaison des candidats - Création de tests et de quizz - Enquêtes et feedback - Entretien vidéo en direct - Entretiens devant un jury - Gestion de la formation - Gestion des applications - Gestion des candidats - Gestion des commentaires - Gestion des entretiens - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des modèles - Gestion des performances - Gestion des talents - Gestion des tâches - Gestion des évaluations - Importation et exportation de données - Intégration des employés - Modèles - Notation - Outils de collaboration - Plans de développement individuel - Portail libre-service - Profils des employés - Questions personnalisables - Rappels - Rapports et analyses - Stockage des CV - Suivi des candidatures - Tableau de bord d'activités - Tests de recrutement - Tests en ligne - Tests et évaluations - Tests personnalisables - Évaluation des compétences - Évaluation et notation des compétences - Évaluations individuelles ## Intégrations (65 au total) - ADP Workforce Now - ATS OnDemand - AcquireTM - AdParlor - ApplicantStack - Ashby - Avature - BambooHR - Breezy - Breezy - Bullhorn - Cadient - Carerix - Chameleon - Checkr ... et 50 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels pour tests de recrutement](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels pour tests de recrutement](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30863/pre-employment-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de carrière](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/33396/career-management/software) - [Logiciels d'entretien vidéo](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30821/video-interviewing/software) - [Logiciels d'évaluation](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/31117/assessment/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des talents](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/10029/talent-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [100Hires](https://fr.capterra.be/software/206957/100hires) — 4.9/5 (1215 reviews) 2. [ZipRecruiter](https://fr.capterra.be/software/130706/ziprecruiter) — 4.2/5 (10959 reviews) 3. [CEIPAL ATS](https://fr.capterra.be/software/135562/ceipal-ats) — 4.6/5 (1265 reviews) 4. [Zoho Recruit](https://fr.capterra.be/software/125768/zoho-recruit) — 4.5/5 (1294 reviews) 5. [Paylocity](https://fr.capterra.be/software/86714/webpay) — 4.3/5 (1974 reviews) ## Avis ### "Criteria making hiring better" — 5.0/5 > **Robert** | *6 juillet 2026* | Transport routier/ferroviaire | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I highly value the ability to curate assessments specifically tailored to each role. It allows for a much more precise evaluation process. Furthermore, the platform enables us to use performance scores to validate our hiring quality, providing historical data that will be invaluable for making more informed, data-driven hiring decisions in the future. > > **Inconvénients**: One significant drawback is the inability to view or export aggregate test scores for all candidates in one place. This forces us to manually track and compile data in external spreadsheets, which is time-consuming and prevents us from easily leveraging historical data to inform future hiring decisions. > > The staff at Criteria has been incredibly responsive and helpful, consistently providing excellent suggestions on how we can better utilize the full range of features the platform offers. ----- ### "Criteria- Talent Hunt" — 5.0/5 > **Muhammad Zohaib** | *20 août 2026* | Construction | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Criteria Software offers a user-friendly experience with a manageable learning curve and strong security for HR data. It provides good value for money with comprehensive features, customization options, and efficient candidate interview management. Its payroll management capabilities also help automate processes, reduce manual work, and improve accuracy. > > **Inconvénients**: Criteria Software have advanced features, and some customizations can require additional technical support. Cost will increase with additional users or features, while certain advanced HR, interview, and payroll requirements may need extra configuration. > > My overall experience remains very good with it. As I am a Talent Acquisition officer and also working on payroll as well, it is making my work easy. ----- ### "Recruiter Experience and Hiring Team's Value from CCAT" — 2.0/5 > **Tiffany** | *1 septembre 2026* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 3.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I like the integration between GreenHouse. It is super easy to use and very intuitive for folks that are sending out the CCAT to candidates through our ATS system. > > **Inconvénients**: I don't think it provides a whole lot of information to the Hiring Manager that isn't something we can find from a normal interview process. It's been difficult getting Hiring Teams to read through the results and use the data provided and most of them feel they don't think it provides any additional information that would be necessary to make a hiring decision. I also don't like that you can't send a second criteria corp link through our GH integration and instead we have to go on Criteria Corp's website to find the candidate and send it via the web browser. > > My overall experience with Criteria has been okay. I think overall the product did a great job with integration with the ATS system but to be honest I don't 100% see the value in the product itself coming from the recruiting side or the hiring team size. ----- ### "A Valuable Tool for Identifying Top Talent" — 5.0/5 > **Junior** | *11 septembre 2026* | Externalisation/délocalisation | Taux de recommandation : 7.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I liked most about Criteria was how user-friendly and structured the platform is. It made the assessment process straightforward and provided useful insights to support the overall candidate evaluation. > > **Inconvénients**: Some of the assessments can be quite long, which may make it challenging for candidates to stay fully engaged throughout the process. Shortening certain assessments could make the experience more efficient while still providing valuable insights. > > Overall, my experience with Criteria has been positive. The platform is user-friendly and provides valuable insights to support the candidate assessment process. ----- ### "TA Supervisor" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandra** | *31 août 2026* | Fabrication électrique/électronique | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Criteria was easy to use and gave us a consistent, standardized way to assess candidates beyond what we could gather from a resume or initial screening. I especially liked the ability to use assessments such as the CCAT to better understand a candidate’s aptitude and problem-solving ability. The platform was straightforward for both recruiters and candidates, and results were easy to review and incorporate into the hiring process. > > **Inconvénients**: The biggest limitation was that assessment results did not always tell the full story of a candidate. For some of the highly technical and field-based positions we recruit for, relevant industry experience and hands-on knowledge can be more valuable than performance on a standardized assessment. Because of that, Criteria worked best as one data point in the hiring decision rather than a deciding factor. > > Overall, my experience with Criteria was positive. It provided an efficient and consistent way to add another layer of data to our candidate evaluation process and was easy to manage from a recruiting perspective. I found it most valuable when the assessment results were used alongside recruiter screening, technical experience, and hiring manager feedback rather than as a standalone measure of candidate quality. ----- Page : 1/11\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/119740/criteria?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.be/software/119740/criteria) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Données structurées