--- description: Box : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Box, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Belgique. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Box - Avis, prix, tarif et abonnement - Capterra Belgique 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels d'affichage dynamique](/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) > [Box](/software/148766/box) # Box Canonical: https://fr.capterra.be/software/148766/box Page : 1/227\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/148766/box?page=2) > Box est une plateforme de gestion de contenu moderne qui transforme la façon dont les organisations travaillent et collaborent pour leur permettre d'obtenir des résultats plus rapidement. > > Conclusion : 5637 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.4/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Box ? Tout type d'entreprise ayant besoin de partager du contenu de manière sécurisée et évolutive tout en collaborant sur le cloud. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.4/5** | 5637 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Box - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2005 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 20,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: allemand, anglais, chinois, chinois traditionnel, coréen, danois, espagnol, finnois, français, hindi, italien, japonais, néerlandais, polonais, portugais brésilien, russe, suédois, turc - **Pays disponibles**: Allemagne, Australie, Canada, Chine, Inde, Japon, Royaume-Uni, États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - @mentions - Accès et contrôle à distance - Accès mobile - Assistance à distance - Authentification - Bibliothèque de contenu - Catégorisation des ressources - Classification des documents - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Cryptage - Définition des priorités - Estimation des coûts - Fonction de glisser-déposer - Gestion de contenu - Gestion des affectations - Gestion des documents - Gestion des délais - Gestion des modèles - Gestion des métadonnées - Gestion des réunions - Gestion des tâches - Gestion du stockage de données - Importation et exportation de données - Marquage - Messagerie - Mise en forme de texte - Modèles personnalisables - Notes et commentaires - Options de publication de contenu - Outils de collaboration - Piste d'audit - Real-Time Monitoring - Recherche en texte intégral - Saisie de documents - Sauvegarde et récupération - Signature électronique - Stockage de documents - Stockage sécurisé des données - Stratégie de marque personnalisable - Subcontractor Monitoring - Suivi des activités - Suivi des projets - Suivi des statuts - Synchronisation de données - Synchronisation en temps réel - Sécurité des données - Tableau de bord d'activités - Task Editing - Transfert de fichiers - Visualiseur de fichiers sécurisé ... et 16 fonctionnalités supplémentaires ## Intégrations (76 au total) - Adobe Workfront - Airtable - AppOmni - AppSheet - Asana - Benchling - Bluebeam Revu - CI HUB Connector - ChatGPT - Claris Connect - Claude - CloudSign - Darktrace - Device Magic - Docusign ... et 61 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels d'affichage dynamique](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels d'affichage dynamique](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/10055/digital-signage/software) - [Logiciels de gestion documentaire](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30063/document-management/software) - [Outils collaboratifs](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de contenu](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/10007/content-management/software) - [Outils DAM (digital asset management)](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30203/digital-asset-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Google Drive](https://fr.capterra.be/software/161425/drive) — 4.8/5 (28542 reviews) 2. [Google Workspace](https://fr.capterra.be/software/168389/google-workspace) — 4.7/5 (17618 reviews) 3. [OneDrive](https://fr.capterra.be/software/161304/onedrive) — 4.5/5 (12768 reviews) 4. [Microsoft 365](https://fr.capterra.be/software/58688/microsoft-365) — 4.6/5 (14116 reviews) 5. [Microsoft SharePoint](https://fr.capterra.be/software/1167/sharepoint) — 4.4/5 (5446 reviews) ## Avis ### "une plateforme vraiment géniale" — 5.0/5 > **Karine** | *28 novembre 2024* | Immobilier | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Box est une plateforme vraiment géniale pour gérer tous mes documents immobiliers. J'adore le fait de pouvoir tout centraliser au même endroit : les photos des biens, les promesses de vente, les diagnostics, les mandats... C'est super pratique pour y accéder de n'importe où, que ce soit sur mon ordinateur au bureau ou sur mon téléphone pendant les visites. > > **Inconvénients**: Pour être honnête, je n'en vois pas vraiment \! Box est simple à utiliser, sécurisé et offre toutes les fonctionnalités dont j'ai besoin dans mon travail. ----- ### "Heavy File go easy" — 5.0/5 > **Vertika** | *1 mars 2026* | Appareils médicaux | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It has the feature to upload and keep very heavy files any excel, documents, which is not possible to share and access on outlook > > **Inconvénients**: Ask for access for logging in, like there are two access window to acknowledge either own company or outside the company, the consent and login to be provided , if outside ethe company, email is required to access the file. This step is mandatory to work every time on same file - box feature > > Perfect so far, it allows excel sheet to be linked with salesforce as well, live fresh up to date data is refreshed and can be access with multiple team members ----- ### "CLOUD STORAGE" — 4.0/5 > **Andrea** | *17 octobre 2025* | Génie mécanique ou industriel | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: As a consultant working with sensitive and complex engineering data, security and controlled access are my top priorities. What I appreciate most about Box is its robust set of security and administrative features. The ability to create secure folders for each project and invite clients or team members with granular permissions (e.g., view-only, uploader, editor) is invaluable. This ensures that valuable intellectual property, like proprietary CAD designs for motorsport applications, is protected. Furthermore, the version control system is excellent. In mechanical design, we go through countless iterations. Box automatically saves previous versions of a file, allowing me to track changes or revert to an earlier design if necessary. This provides a clear audit trail and prevents the common issue of team members working off of outdated files. The platform serves as a reliable single source of truth for all project-related documentation. > > **Inconvénients**: While Box is great for general file management, its performance and features lag when handling the specific demands of heavy 3D CAD files and complex assemblies. Syncing very large files (often several gigabytes) through the desktop client can be slow and resource-intensive, interrupting workflow. More importantly, Box lacks the specialized tools I rely on in dedicated Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) systems like Teamcenter or Windchill. It doesn't have an integrated 3D viewer that can properly render complex assemblies, check for interferences, or manage part dependencies and Bills of Materials (BOMs). This means I always have to download the files locally to do any meaningful engineering review, which adds an extra, inefficient step to the process. > > My overall experience with Box is positive, with the understanding that it is a tool for secure file sharing and collaboration, not a replacement for a dedicated engineering PLM solution. It excels at centralizing project documents, managing client deliverables, and facilitating communication around non-CAD files like specifications, reports, and presentations. The security infrastructure gives me confidence when sharing sensitive information with external partners. However, for the core task of collaborative mechanical design, it serves more as a secure repository than an active workspace. It's an excellent complementary tool in my digital toolkit for managing the business side of engineering projects, but it falls short of handling the high-performance demands and intricacies of iterative 3D design work. ----- ### "Stay away from these crooks" — 1.0/5 > **Anne** | *25 juillet 2025* | Services financiers | Taux de recommandation : 0.0/10 > > **Avantages**: It works well as long as you don't have a security breach and need support. If you try contacting them, they are resistant and angry, which on top of ignorance is hard to take. > > **Inconvénients**: TERRIBLE customer service. Huge overcharges that they refuse to even acknowledge much less credit back. NEVER give this company a credit card. > > I tried to reduce the number of seats we are charged for with their online tool and they charged for double the number of seats. After a week, the only response to multiple inquiries is "You have to call on the phone," but their site provides no phone number. But I'm not offended: they also refuse to respond to the credit card company and the Better Business Bureau. Either Box is terribly managed or they actually care more about a few thousand dollars than about their reputation as corporate pirates. This company has deteriorated in the last few years and now Dropbox is far better. ----- ### "Secure, Reliable Document Management Built for Enterprise" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *23 avril 2026* | Services juridiques | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I liked most about Box was its strong focus on secure, enterprise‑grade file storage and collaboration, combined with ease of use. In particular: Robust security and compliance – Box excels at protecting sensitive information with granular permission controls, encryption, and compliance features, making it especially well‑suited for organizations handling confidential documents. Easy, intuitive file sharing – Sharing files and folders—internally or externally—is simple and user‑friendly, with clear control over access levels and expiration settings. Strong collaboration features – Real‑time comments, version history, and file previews made collaboration straightforward without needing to download files. Excellent Microsoft integration – Seamless integration with tools like Microsoft 365 (Word, Excel, Outlook) made it easy to edit and collaborate on documents without leaving Box. Centralized document management – Box did a great job of keeping documents organized and accessible, reducing version confusion and scattered file storage. Overall, what stood out most was Box’s ability to balance security with usability. It felt reliable and professional while still being easy for users to collaborate efficiently—particularly valuable for teams or organizations with strict data protection requirements. > > **Inconvénients**: What I liked least about Box was that, while it’s very strong on security and compliance, it can sometimes feel heavy and less flexible for everyday use. In particular: Interface can feel cluttered – With many enterprise features layered in, the user experience isn’t always as clean or intuitive as some lighter file‑sharing tools. Performance with large folders – Navigating or syncing folders with many large files could occasionally feel slow. Offline access limitations – Working with files offline wasn’t always as seamless, especially compared to native desktop file systems. Administrative complexity – Managing permissions, policies, and settings requires careful attention, which can be time‑consuming for administrators. Cost for advanced features – Pricing can add up, particularly when advanced security, collaboration, or compliance features are required. Overall, the main drawback was that Box sometimes felt overbuilt for simpler needs. It’s excellent for regulated or security‑focused environments, but for teams looking for speed and simplicity first, it can feel more complex than necessary. > > My overall experience with Box was reliable and professional, particularly in environments where security, compliance, and document control are priorities. Box performed very well as a centralized document management and collaboration platform. It provided strong confidence that files were stored securely, with clear version history, access controls, and auditability. Sharing documents—both internally and with external parties—was straightforward, and the ability to manage permissions at a granular level was especially valuable when working with sensitive or confidential information. Collaboration features such as file previews, comments, and real‑time editing worked smoothly and reduced the need to download documents or rely on multiple versions. Integration with Microsoft 365 was a notable strength, allowing documents to be edited and co‑authored efficiently while remaining within Box’s secure environment. That said, the experience sometimes felt heavy for everyday use. The interface can feel busy, especially for users who only need basic file storage and sharing. Performance occasionally slowed when working with large folders or many files, and offline access was less intuitive than native desktop file systems. From an administrative perspective, managing settings and permissions required careful oversight, which added complexity. Overall, I found Box to be a strong, enterprise‑grade solution that excels in security and governance. While it may feel overbuilt for simple file sharing needs, it delivers significant value for organizations that require structured document management, compliance, and controlled collaboration. ----- Page : 1/227\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/148766/box?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.be/software/148766/box) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées