--- description: BrowserStack : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur BrowserStack, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Belgique. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: BrowserStack - Avis, prix, tarif et abonnement - Capterra Belgique 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Logiciels de test automatisé](/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) > [BrowserStack](/software/162900/browserstack) # BrowserStack Canonical: https://fr.capterra.be/software/162900/browserstack Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) > Plateforme de test multinavigateur conçue pour aider les développeurs à tester des applications mobiles et des sites web. > > Conclusion : 775 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.6/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise BrowserStack ? En bref : toute personne qui conçoit et/ou développe pour le web ouvert. Ces outils de test interactifs multinavigateurs ne requièrent aucune compétence en codage. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.6/5** | 775 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.6/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.4/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.5/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 90% | (9/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: BrowserStack - **Entreprise fondée en**: 2011 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 39,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afrique du Sud, Allemagne, Australie, Brésil, Canada, Danemark, Inde, Irlande, Israël, Mexique, Royaume-Uni, Singapour, Émirats arabes unis, États-Unis, Îles Vierges britanniques, Îles Vierges des États-Unis ## Fonctionnalités - Alertes/Notifications - Annotations - Archivage et rétention - Assurance qualité - Automated Testing - Ciblage du public - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Détection d'anomalies - Enquêtes et feedback - Enregistrement et transcription vidéo - Gestion de projets - Gestion de versions - Gestion des audits - Gestion des documents - Gestion des exigences - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des incidents - Gestion des performances - Gestion des risques - Gestion des référentiels - Gestion des tests - Gestion des tests de logiciels - Identification des goulots d'étranglement - Indicateurs quantitatifs - Intégration continue - Mesure des performances - Monitoring - Monitoring réseau - Multiple Test Types - Outils de collaboration - Piste d'audit - Prise en charge de l'exécution parallèle - Rapports et analyses - Scripts de test - Scénarios de test de charge - Suivi de la conformité - Suivi des activités - Suivi des problèmes - Suivi des problèmes - Taçabilité - Test de charge - Test des performances - Test mobile - Test web - Visualisation de données - Vue hiérarchique - Vérification des scripts de test ## Intégrations (16 au total) - Appium - Bitbucket - CircleCI - Cypress - Espresso - GitHub - Jenkins - Jira - Microsoft Visual Studio - Netlify - Slack - Travis CI - Trello - Tricentis qTest - WordPress ... et 1 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support téléphonique - Chat ## Category - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Logiciels de test automatisé](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30609/automated-testing/software) - [Logiciels de bug tracking](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30090/bug-tracking/software) - [Logiciels de test utilisateur](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/32295/user-testing/software) - [Logiciels de test de charge](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/32135/load-testing/software) - [Logiciels de gestion des tests](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/34315/test-management-tools/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Lyssna](https://fr.capterra.be/software/178766/usabilityhub) — 4.6/5 (87 reviews) 2. [TestRail](https://fr.capterra.be/software/128204/testrail) — 4.3/5 (179 reviews) 3. [QA Wolf](https://fr.capterra.be/software/1012378/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (73 reviews) 4. [kapptivate](https://fr.capterra.be/software/1069772/kapptivate) — 4.5/5 (6 reviews) 5. [Lightster](https://fr.capterra.be/software/1063000/lightster) — 4.7/5 (9 reviews) ## Avis ### "Good service" — 4.0/5 > **Seppe** | *24 mars 2026* | Informatique et sécurité réseau | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: That there are alot of devices to chose from and they all work fast and have great internet and speed. > > **Inconvénients**: Sometimes the vnc connection can be a bit weird and can be a bit laggy sometimes. Sometimes the image quality isn’t that great. ----- ### "Fast and Efficient Browser Testing" — 5.0/5 > **Yash** | *9 juillet 2026* | Services et technologies de l'information | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: BrowserStack is easy to use and offers excellent browser and device coverage for efficient cross-browser testing. It saves time by quickly identifying compatibility issues across different environments. > > **Inconvénients**: The pricing can be expensive for smaller teams, and remote sessions may occasionally experience slight lag. Some advanced features also take time for new users to learn. > > Overall, my experience with BrowserStack has been very good. It's a reliable and user-friendly platform that makes cross-browser testing fast and efficient. ----- ### "The Unfair Advantage Every QA/Automation Team Deserves" — 5.0/5 > **Yogesh** | *2 avril 2026* | Produits chimiques | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Five years on the enterprise plan and the one thing I like most is how BrowserStack completely removes infrastructure as a problem. Real devices with SIM support, thousands of browser and OS combinations, instant availability, no maintenance overhead. App Live and App Automate work seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, Playwright and most of automation tools without any complex setup. Parallel execution is significantly faster than any self hosted grid I have managed. The newly released no code low code testing is also best, accessibility testing and visual regression tools are production ready and not just checkboxes. For an enterprise team this is the best investment in the testing stack. > > **Inconvénients**: Pricing is the one honest gripe. BrowserStack is worth every rupee but it is not cheap, and for smaller teams or startups the enterprise plan can feel like a stretch. Parallel session limits on lower tiers push you to upgrade faster than expected and when your team scales quickly, the cost scales with it in a way that requires a conversation with finance every renewal cycle. > > BrowserStack did not just improve our testing workflow, It transformed how our entire engineering culture thinks about quality. The chaos before was real. Flaky emulators, inconsistent local device setups, test results that meant nothing because the environment was never stable. Onboarding a new automation tool meant weeks of configuration, compatibility debugging and infrastructure work before a single meaningful test ran. From day one on the BS plan the difference was visible. Real devices, real browsers, real network conditions, available instantly, every single time. No queues, no "device is offline," no environment drift. The confidence in our test results changed overnight because the platform underneath them was finally reliable. Across multiple automation tools integration experience has been consistently smooth. Switching frameworks mid project did not mean rebuilding infrastructure, It meant updating a config and moving on. That kind of flexibility is rare and genuinely underappreciated until you have worked without it. App Live became the go to for exploratory testing on real devices with SIM support. App Automate handled mobile regression at a scale and speed a physical device lab three times our budget could not have matched. The freedom to choose between virtual and real devices depending on the test objective gave us precision we simply did not have before. The no code and low code capabilities brought manual QA members directly into the automation process, accessibility testing and visual regression are now standard pipeline stages, not separate afterthought tools. Everything lives in one platform, reporting is unified and session management gives complete visibility into what ran, when and exactly why something failed. Enterprise support has been a genuine partner throughout, Issues resolved by people who actually understand automation deeply, not generic ticket handlers. There is a reason it remains the one tool in the stack that has never been up for replacement. It is not just a platform, it is the foundation our entire quality process is built on. ----- ### "Okay, but not the best for Test Management" — 3.0/5 > **Jess** | *2 avril 2026* | Logiciels | Taux de recommandation : 6.0/10 > > **Avantages**: They have the right idea with Test Management but the execution is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. Their support team is top tier. > > **Inconvénients**: The bugs, the execution of Test Management is a little iffy. For example the drag and drop for copying a test case will work for a bit, then stop. > > Overall its neutral. We ended up switching to Qase for better/cheaper AI test case creation. BrowserStacks support team has been great through the various issues but we did run into a lot of issues. ----- ### "Comprehensive testing suite" — 4.0/5 > **Utilisateur vérifié** | *25 avril 2026* | E-learning | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: The breadth of offerings is very convenient. I feel like any time I have a testing need, I can find what I need to help our department. > > **Inconvénients**: Pricing can get very onesy-twosy - meaning sometimes you feel like you are nickeled and dimed a bit. Perhaps some more bundling would be preferential. ----- Page : 1/32\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/162900/browserstack?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.be/software/162900/browserstack) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées