--- description: Basecamp : qu'en pensent les utilisateurs ? Lisez les avis clients sur Basecamp, consultez les prix, tarifs, abonnements et découvrez ses fonctionnalités grâce à Capterra Belgique. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Basecamp - Avis, prix, tarif et abonnement - Capterra Belgique 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Accueil](/) > [Outils collaboratifs](/directory/15/collaboration/software) > [Basecamp](/software/56808/basecamp) # Basecamp Canonical: https://fr.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp Page : 1/578\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) > Légitimé par des millions d'utilisateurs, Basecamp centralise tout ce dont vous avez besoin pour faire votre travail. > > Conclusion : 14419 utilisateurs lui ont donné la note de **4.3/5**. Figure au meilleur classement pour **Probabilité de recommander le produit**. ----- ## Présentation ### Qui utilise Basecamp ? Entrepreneurs, travailleurs indépendants, petites entreprises et groupes au sein de grandes organisations. ## Statistiques et notes | Métrique | Notation | En détail | | **Note globale** | **4.3/5** | 14419 Avis | | Simplicité | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Support client | 4.3/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Rapport qualité-prix | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Fonctionnalités | 4.2/5 | D'après l'ensemble des avis | | Pourcentage de recommandation | 80% | (8/10 Probabilité de recommander le produit) | ## À propos de l'éditeur - **Société**: Basecamp - **Pays**: Chicago, É.-U. - **Entreprise fondée en**: 1999 ## Contexte commercial - **À partir de**: 15,00 $US - **Type de licence**: (Version gratuite disponible) (Version d’essai gratuite) - **Public cible**: Auto-entrepreneur, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1 000, 1 001–5 000, 5 001–10 000, 10 000+ - **Déploiement et plateformes**: Cloud, SaaS, web, Mac (ordinateur), Windows (ordinateur), Android (mobile), iPhone (mobile), iPad (mobile) - **Langues**: anglais - **Pays disponibles**: Afghanistan, Afrique du Sud, Albanie, Algérie, Allemagne, Andorre, Angola, Anguilla, Antigua-et-Barbuda, Arabie saoudite, Argentine, Arménie, Aruba, Australie, Autriche, Azerbaïdjan, Bahamas, Bahreïn, Bangladesh, Barbade et 207 de plus ## Fonctionnalités - @mentions - Accès mobile - Alertes/Notifications - Autorisations basées sur les rôles - Chat en temps réel - Chat et messagerie - Configuration des workflows - Contrôles/Permissions d'accès - Discussions/Forums - Définition des priorités - Enquêtes et feedback - Fil d'activités et d'actualités - Fonction de glisser-déposer - Gestion de la communication - Gestion des affectations - Gestion des calendriers - Gestion des documents - Gestion des délais - Gestion des flux de travail - Gestion des idées - Gestion des tâches - Messagerie - Messagerie instantanée - Modèles personnalisables - Notes et commentaires - Outils de collaboration - Partage des fichiers - Planification et programmation de projets - Rapports et statistiques - Recherche/Filtre - Reporting et suivi de projet - Roadmap stratégique de produits - Sub-Task Management - Suivi de la progression - Suivi de la progression des tâches - Suivi des projets - Suivi des étapes - Suivi du temps - Tableau de bord d'activités - Task Editing - Third-Party Integrations ## Intégrations (93 au total) - AgencyDots - Akita - Apideck - Asana - AssessTEAM - Bridge24 - BrightGauge - Calamari - Centreli - Claritee - ClicData - ClickUp - Clockify - CoSchedule Marketing Suite - Cyfe ... et 78 intégrations supplémentaires ## Ressources d'aide - Service client/e-mail - FAQ/forums - Base de connaissances - Support 24/7 (réponse directe) - Chat ## Category - [Outils collaboratifs](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/15/collaboration/software) ## Catégories connexes - [Outils collaboratifs](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/15/collaboration/software) - [Outils de gestion de projets](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de tâches](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/10030/task-management/software) - [Logiciels de communication d'équipe](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/31033/team-communication/software) - [Logiciels de gestion de projet à but non lucratif](https://fr.capterra.be/directory/32439/project-management-software-for-nonprofits/software) ## Alternatives 1. [monday.com](https://fr.capterra.be/software/147657/monday-com) — 4.6/5 (6040 reviews) 2. [Clockify](https://fr.capterra.be/software/169607/clockify) — 4.8/5 (9243 reviews) 3. [Jira](https://fr.capterra.be/software/19319/jira) — 4.4/5 (15381 reviews) 4. [Asana](https://fr.capterra.be/software/120550/asana-pm) — 4.5/5 (13579 reviews) 5. [Trello](https://fr.capterra.be/software/1010321/trello) — 4.5/5 (23537 reviews) ## Avis ### "Intuitif \!" — 5.0/5 > **Capucine** | *30 avril 2025* | Immobilier | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Le logiciel Basecamp est facile de prise en main et agréable à utiliser. Il est intuitif et permet grâce à ses nombreuses fonctionnalités de gérer les projets et l’organisation interne. > > **Inconvénients**: Les inconvénients sont plutôt les contraintes et les limites du logiciel c’est à dire une personnalisation restreinte, les fonctionnalités peuvent être limitées pour la gestion de projets complexes et pas d’automatisation. > > L’utilisation de Basecamp est idéal pour faciliter la collaboration au sein de vos équipes pour mener à bien vos différents projets du plus simples au plus élaboré \! ----- ### "Garde les Projets sur la Bonne Voie" — 5.0/5 > **Alexandra** | *9 septembre 2024* | Développement et commerce international | Taux de recommandation : 9.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Basecamp garde mes projets bien organisés et m'aide à suivre mes tâches. C'est simple et clair, donc facile à utiliser avec mon équipe. > > **Inconvénients**: Le seul souci, c'est qu'il manque quelques fonctionnalités avancées dont les grandes équipes pourraient avoir besoin pour des projets complexes. ----- ### "Basecamp great for collaboration and project management" — 4.0/5 > **Damian** | *21 mai 2026* | Gestion d'organisme à but non lucratif | Taux de recommandation : 8.0/10 > > **Avantages**: Basecamp allows for great collaboration. Both internally and with external vendors. Good for project management and assigning tasks to members of a project group. Easy to have back and forth chat on a task/project and copy in others. > > **Inconvénients**: Repetition of notification emails when an update on a project is made and a task is also allocated to someone. > > Great tool for team collaboration, organizing, delegating tasks, staying on track with project timeline/due dates and overall project management. ----- ### "Basecamp: Clarity and Communication Over Complexity" — 5.0/5 > **Radha** | *23 avril 2026* | Services juridiques | Taux de recommandation : 10.0/10 > > **Avantages**: What I liked most about Basecamp was its simplicity and clarity. It’s designed to help teams stay organized without feeling overwhelmed. In particular: Clean, user‑friendly interface – Basecamp is easy to navigate, even for new users. Everything is laid out clearly, which reduces confusion and onboarding time. Focused approach to project management – Instead of endless features, Basecamp sticks to core tools like to‑do lists, message boards, schedules, and file sharing. This keeps teams focused on actual work. Strong communication structure – Centralized message boards and comment threads cut down on scattered emails and make it easier to follow conversations over time. Transparency and accountability – Everyone can see what’s happening, who’s responsible for what, and what’s coming next, which supports collaboration and ownership. Minimal setup and maintenance – Projects can be created and managed quickly without complex configuration or customization. Overall, the biggest strength of Basecamp is how it reduces noise and complexity, making it especially effective for teams that value clear communication and straightforward project tracking over heavy customization or advanced workflows. > > **Inconvénients**: What I liked least about Basecamp was that its simplicity can also feel limiting, especially for more complex or fast‑moving teams. In particular: Limited advanced features – Basecamp intentionally avoids things like custom workflows, detailed task dependencies, or advanced reporting, which can make it feel restrictive for larger or more structured projects. Not ideal for complex project tracking – There’s no native support for things like Gantt charts, workload planning, or time tracking, which some teams rely on for visibility and deadlines. Flat structure can feel rigid – Since all projects follow the same basic setup, it’s harder to adapt Basecamp to different project types or processes. Fewer automation options – Compared to other project management tools, automation and integrations are relatively minimal, which can mean more manual follow‑up. Scaling challenges – As the number of projects and conversations grows, it can become harder to manage or surface priorities quickly. Overall, what I liked least wasn’t a flaw so much as a trade‑off: Basecamp prioritizes simplicity over flexibility. That works well for straightforward collaboration but can feel limiting for teams that need more structure, customization, or advanced tracking tools. > > My overall experience with Basecamp was positive and refreshing, especially for teams that value clarity, communication, and simplicity over complex project management frameworks. Basecamp excelled at keeping work organized and easy to follow. Its clean interface and straightforward structure made it easy for everyone on the team to understand where discussions were happening, what tasks were assigned, and what deadlines were coming up—without needing formal training or ongoing system management. Communication felt more intentional and less fragmented thanks to centralized message boards and discussion threads, which significantly reduced email back‑and‑forth. The platform encouraged a calmer, more focused way of working. By limiting features to the essentials, Basecamp helped prevent over‑planning and micromanagement. For smaller teams or projects with well‑defined goals, this approach supported collaboration and accountability without adding unnecessary overhead. However, the experience became less ideal as project complexity increased. The lack of advanced task dependencies, customization, reporting, or automation meant that more structured teams or deadline‑driven projects sometimes needed workarounds or supplementary tools. In those cases, Basecamp felt more suited to coordination and communication than detailed project tracking. Overall, I found Basecamp to be a strong collaboration tool that works best for teams seeking simplicity, transparency, and reduced noise. While it’s not built for highly complex project management, it delivers a smooth, user‑friendly experience that supports effective teamwork and clear communication. ----- ### "Small Scale Project Management" — 3.0/5 > **Matilda** | *12 mai 2026* | Enseignement supérieur | Taux de recommandation : 4.0/10 > > **Avantages**: I like that it was fairly easy to set up different projects\! It was nice to see all to dos in one space and keep an eye on all the projects you're working on. > > **Inconvénients**: It wasn't the best for complex projects. A lot of our projects can span multiple years and cross different teams and I found Basecamp lacked the infrastructure to allow us to easily work on these more complex projects. > > For the time I worked with it I found that we were able to successfully accomplish our projects but as our team and scope expanded, we ultimately out grew the abilities of Basecamp. ----- Page : 1/578\ Suivant: [Page suivante](https://fr.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp?page=2) ## Liens - [Afficher sur Capterra](https://fr.capterra.be/software/56808/basecamp) ## Cette page est disponible dans les langues suivantes. | Langue | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pl | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Données structurées